Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

LED ±¤ÁßÇÕ±âÀÇ Á¶»ç mode°¡ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼°æµµ ¹× ¼öÃàÀÀ·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

INFLUENCE OF IRRADIATION MODES ON THE MICROHARDNESS AND THE POLYMERIZATION CONTRACTION OF COMPOSITE RESIN POLYMERIZED WITH LED CURING UNIT

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 32±Ç 2È£ p.312 ~ 320
¹ÚÀÎÈ£, ¿ÀÀ¯Çâ, À̳­¿µ, ÀÌâ¼·, ÀÌ»óÈ£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÀÎÈ£ ( Park In-Ho ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¿ÀÀ¯Çâ ( Oh You-Hyang ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À̳­¿µ ( Lee Nan-Young ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌâ¼· ( Lee Chang-Seep ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»óÈ£ ( Lee Sang-Ho ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº LED ±¤ÁßÇÕ±â(Elipar Freelight 2£¿, 3M-ESPE, USA)ÀÇ Á¶»ç mode¿¡ µû¸¥ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø(Supreme£¿, Filtek Flow£¿, 3M-ESPE USA)ÀÇ ¼öÃàÀÀ·Â°ú ¹Ì¼¼°æµµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¼öÃàÀÀ·ÂÀ» ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇØ ½ºÆ®·¹ÀÎ °ÔÀÌÁö°¡ »ç¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. Ç¥º»Àº Á¶»ç mode¿Í ÃæÀü¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¶ó 6°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾îÁ³´Ù.

A±º: Filtek Flow£¿ÀÌÀå, Supreme£¿ ÃæÀü, 10ÃÊ ±¤ÁßÇÕ, B±º: Filtek Flow£¿ÀÌÀå, Supreme£¿ ÃæÀü, 15ÃÊ ±¤ÁßÇÕ,

C±º: Filtek Flow£¿ÀÌÀå, Supreme£¿ÃæÀü, 15ÃÊ soft start ±¤ÁßÇÕ, D±º Supreme£¿ ÃæÀü, 10ÃÊ ±¤ÁßÇÕ,

E±º: Supreme£¿ÃæÀü, 15ÃÊ ±¤ÁßÇÕ, F±º: Supreme£¿ÃæÀü, 15ÃÊ soft start±¤ÁßÇÕ.

½ºÆ®·¹ÀÎ °ÔÀÌÁö¸¦ ¾ÆÅ©¸±¸¯ ¸µ¿¡ ºÎÂøÇÏ°í strain meter¿¡ ¿¬°áÇÑ ÈÄ ±¤ÁßÇÕÇÏ°í 10ºÐ µ¿¾È 1ÃÊ °£°ÝÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ±â·ÏÇÏ¿´´Ù. 24½Ã°£ ÈÄ¿¡ °¢°¢ Ç¥º»ÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼°æµµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á°ú´Â ANOVA¿Í Tukey test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°¾Ò´Ù.

1. Soft start curing ÇßÀ» ¶§ ¼öÃàÀÀ·Â ÀÌ ³·¾Ò´Ù(p<0.05). Flow able resinÀ» ÀÌÀåÇÑ ±º¿¡¼­´Â È¿°ú°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.

2. 10ÃÊ°£ Á¶»çÇÑ ±ºÀº 15ÃÊ°£ Á¶»çÇÑ ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ¼öÃàÀÀ·ÂÀÌ Àû¾ú´Ù(p<0.05)

3. ¹Ì¼¼°æµµ ÃøÁ¤°á°ú »ó¸é°ú Çϸ鿡¼­ °¢ ±º °£¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p>0.05). ÇÏÁö¸¸, ÇϸéÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼°æµµ°¡ »ó¸é¿¡ ºñÇØ 80%¿¡ À̸£Áö ¸øÇß´Ù.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the polymerization contraction and the micro hardness of composite resin(Supreme£¿, Filtek Flow£¿, 3M-ESPE, USA) according to irradiation modes of LED curing unit(Elipar Freelight£¿, 3M-ESPE, USA).

The strain guage method was used for determination of polymerization contraction. Sample were divided by 6 groups according to curing modes and filling method.

Group A: Supreme£¿, Filtek Flow£¿ lining, 10seconds curing, Group B: Supreme£¿, Filtek Flow£¿ lining, 15seconds curing, Group C: Supreme£¿, Filtek Flow£¿ lining, 15seconds soft start curing, Group D: Supreme£¿ only, 10seconds curing, Group E: Supreme£¿ only, 15seconds curing, Group F: Supreme£¿ only, 15seconds soft start curing

Preparations of acrylic molds were followed by filling and curing. Strain guage attached to each sample were connected to a strain meter. Measurements were recorded at each second for the total of 10 minutes including the periods of light application. And micro hardness of each group after 24hours from light irradiation were measured.

Obtained data were analyzed statistically using Repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey test.

The results of the present study are as follows:

1. In flow able resin liner group, soft start curing group was not found decrease of polymerization contraction. But, In Supreme only filling group, the lowest polymerization contraction was found in soft start curing group.

2. 10 seconds curing group showed statistically significant reduction of polymerization contraction compared with 15 seconds curing group(p<0.05).

3. The micro hardness values of each group not revealed significant difference(p>0.05). But, lower surface micro hardness was not reached 80% of upper surface micro hardness.

Å°¿öµå

LED ±¤ÁßÇÕ±â;¼öÃàÀÀ·Â;¹Ì¼¼°æµµ
LED curing unit;Polymerization contraction;Microhardness

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI